Website Review Tracking Dashboard

Goal

• Publish target: aggregated overall score >= 8.00 / 10
• Required gate: no unresolved Must issues
• Stop rule: gains < 0.20 for two consecutive rounds (or score stably above target)

Round Score Table

Round Change Log

Round 1

• Key changes implemented:

• None. Report-only run.

• What improved:

• N/A for first round.

• What regressed or stayed flat:

• Technical quality and publish polish were the lowest-scoring dimensions.
• Several reviewers flagged the same opening/hierarchy issue: the strongest proof arrives too late.

• Next round focus:

• Remove the duplicate sentence and stray </p>.
• Fix visible copy errors and caption typos.
• Tighten the oversized certification-program claim with more grounded framing.
• Pull the strongest operator thesis/proof earlier in the post.
• Rework the ending so it lands on Jenny’s operating judgment instead of generic encouragement.

Round 2

• Key changes implemented:

• Fixed all publish-quality errors from round 1: duplicate sentence, stray </p>, typo/grammar issues, and misspelled caption.
• Strengthened the certification-program proof with more concrete shipped scope.
• Rewrote one generic operations sentence into a more specific coordination/structure sentence.
• Tightened the recovery anecdote’s last line so it lands more on resilience.

• What improved:

• The post cleared the publish gate and moved from 7.45 to 8.50.
• Technical quality improved most after the markup/copy cleanup.
• Credibility and content quality improved after the certification example named more concrete deliverables.

• What regressed or stayed flat:

• The opening still gets some feedback for delaying the executive-value / role-fit signal.
• The ending still reads slightly more general than the strongest middle sections.
• The custom Copy control remains the only recurring technical/accessibility concern.

• Next round focus:

• Optional polish only: opening fit signal, ending landing point, and Copy block accessibility.

Publish Readiness Checklist

• Aggregated overall score is >= 8.00
• No unresolved Must issues
• Improvement trend is stable or diminishing
• Final synthesis report saved to work/website-review/runs/