Website Review Tracking Dashboard
Goal
- Publish target: aggregated overall score
>= 8.00 / 10 - Required gate: no unresolved
Mustissues - Stop rule: gains
< 0.20for two consecutive rounds (or score stably above target)
Round Score Table
| Round | Timestamp | Reviewers | Clarity (25%) | Credibility (25%) | UX/Conversion (20%) | Quality (15%) | Technical (15%) | Overall (0-10) | Delta vs Prior | Must | Should | Nice | Gate Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-05-01 18:07 PT | 10 | 7.83 | 8.08 | 7.49 | 7.48 | 6.96 | 7.45 | N/A | 4 | 19 | 16 | Not ready: score < 8.00 and Must issues remain |
| 2 | 2026-05-01 18:20 PT | 10 | 8.59 | 8.67 | 8.09 | 8.52 | 8.48 | 8.50 | +1.05 | 0 | 10 | 9 | Ready: score >= 8.00 and no Must issues remain |
Round Change Log
Round 1
-
Key changes implemented:
- None. Report-only run.
-
What improved:
- N/A for first round.
-
What regressed or stayed flat:
- Technical quality and publish polish were the lowest-scoring dimensions.
- Several reviewers flagged the same opening/hierarchy issue: the strongest proof arrives too late.
-
Next round focus:
- Remove the duplicate sentence and stray
</p>. - Fix visible copy errors and caption typos.
- Tighten the oversized certification-program claim with more grounded framing.
- Pull the strongest operator thesis/proof earlier in the post.
- Rework the ending so it lands on Jenny’s operating judgment instead of generic encouragement.
Round 2
-
Key changes implemented:
- Fixed all publish-quality errors from round 1: duplicate sentence, stray
</p>, typo/grammar issues, and misspelled caption. - Strengthened the certification-program proof with more concrete shipped scope.
- Rewrote one generic operations sentence into a more specific coordination/structure sentence.
- Tightened the recovery anecdote’s last line so it lands more on resilience.
-
What improved:
- The post cleared the publish gate and moved from
7.45to8.50. - Technical quality improved most after the markup/copy cleanup.
- Credibility and content quality improved after the certification example named more concrete deliverables.
-
What regressed or stayed flat:
- The opening still gets some feedback for delaying the executive-value / role-fit signal.
- The ending still reads slightly more general than the strongest middle sections.
- The custom
Copycontrol remains the only recurring technical/accessibility concern. -
Next round focus:
- Optional polish only: opening fit signal, ending landing point, and
Copyblock accessibility.
Publish Readiness Checklist
- Aggregated overall score is
>= 8.00 - No unresolved
Mustissues - Improvement trend is stable or diminishing
- Final synthesis report saved to
work/website-review/runs/